The new provincial government has not yet been made, and already on the table in Lorenzo Dellai is the first project: provincialization lifts in Trentino. 50 million are not enough public funding already agreed by the Province to support the next two years even cable cars where the lack of snow and skiers do not. Now he goes further: if the operators of the facilities have accounts in the red, we must think not only helping to heal in the pie 'list every year creating the deficit. What's more, taxpayers now are welcome to finance the purchase of equipment, their maintenance, their continuous renewal.
so that private companies can devote 'only' management (at this point on), and the collection of profits. In short, the old philosophy back into vogue recently with Alitalia advertise the losses and privatize profits. As soon as it reads the plan (which the provincial offices to provide advanced computing, ready to be approved by the new administration after the settlement), we have the ski lifts of State. As in the countries of real socialism. The difference is that there decency (and money) stopped trams and trains to the state. Here, however, the land of socialism a bit 'more pleasure-seeking, the taxes paid by citizens should not be used to fund day-care homes, but glittering Lifts Industry (?) Of the companies cableway. Now this monstrous project
cancel at once the free market, competition, management of budgets wisely (that is, if both the Province pays?) And, above all, the objective assessment of whether it is worth throwing resources in a sector that in the coming years will be required to scale to the lack of snow below a certain altitude. climate change in progress for some time, as confirmed by all studies of the sector, will see the rise of two degrees of temperature within the next few decades. This will reduce the high altitude ski areas, limiting above 1800-2000 meters. Estimates of the Euro-Mediterranean Centre predict that within a generation, only 18% of winter resorts lifts in the Italian Alps can be considered reliable, able to guarantee at least 30 cm of snow for one hundred days a year. This means, among other things, that public money that is intended for the ski lifts in the state, will all be money thrown out the window. Not an investment for the future, but for a splash today, with the certainty that they will have no value for tomorrow. Instead of thinking of setting a new tourism model for the Trentino and the Italian Alps, the mountain that enhances the environment and the beauty it offers, and that is flat on the monoculture of skiing, you get even download all costs irresponsible of this madness on the taxpayer Trentino.
But if the plants they believe in this model, why not pay them? Why should the province to pay for it? Among the rest, the "bailout" of companies located in more difficult is a gross violation of the competition, which damages the area of \u200b\u200bhealthy societies, which are thus put out of business. The state clearly the industry more serious (see Chronicles in the newspaper). Why, if the province takes the company's facilities with the budgets in red, what's the go crazy to make ends meet and to set up economies of scale, and to introduce innovations to market? Here we reward those who make debts and losses, not those with budgets in order. Può reggere un mercato sano tutto questo? Nemmeno la giustificazione che si tratta di «mezzi pubblici» sta in piedi. Infatti, un conto è garantire l'autobus che arrivi in ogni paese, e un altro alimentare artificialmente stazioni in bassa quota che da nessuna altra parte al mondo avrebbe senso mantenere. Le ovovie non sono un servizio pubblico da finanziare con le tasse dei cittadini. Al limite, lo possono essere con l'autofinanziamento degli operatori turistici che traggono vantaggio diretto dalla presenza degli sciatori. Forse è giunto il momento di porre un freno deciso alla collettivizzazione forzata in atto da tempo in questa terra. Perché a questo punto ne va della sopravvivenza del Trentino stesso, già economia assistita, che rischia to become a province-free economy, because all collectivized. The purchase of 50 million of the sheds at Whirlpool are unfortunately one of countless examples.
Pierangelo Giovanetti, director of the Adige
p.giovanetti @ ladige.it
so that private companies can devote 'only' management (at this point on), and the collection of profits. In short, the old philosophy back into vogue recently with Alitalia advertise the losses and privatize profits. As soon as it reads the plan (which the provincial offices to provide advanced computing, ready to be approved by the new administration after the settlement), we have the ski lifts of State. As in the countries of real socialism. The difference is that there decency (and money) stopped trams and trains to the state. Here, however, the land of socialism a bit 'more pleasure-seeking, the taxes paid by citizens should not be used to fund day-care homes, but glittering Lifts Industry (?) Of the companies cableway. Now this monstrous project
cancel at once the free market, competition, management of budgets wisely (that is, if both the Province pays?) And, above all, the objective assessment of whether it is worth throwing resources in a sector that in the coming years will be required to scale to the lack of snow below a certain altitude. climate change in progress for some time, as confirmed by all studies of the sector, will see the rise of two degrees of temperature within the next few decades. This will reduce the high altitude ski areas, limiting above 1800-2000 meters. Estimates of the Euro-Mediterranean Centre predict that within a generation, only 18% of winter resorts lifts in the Italian Alps can be considered reliable, able to guarantee at least 30 cm of snow for one hundred days a year. This means, among other things, that public money that is intended for the ski lifts in the state, will all be money thrown out the window. Not an investment for the future, but for a splash today, with the certainty that they will have no value for tomorrow. Instead of thinking of setting a new tourism model for the Trentino and the Italian Alps, the mountain that enhances the environment and the beauty it offers, and that is flat on the monoculture of skiing, you get even download all costs irresponsible of this madness on the taxpayer Trentino.
But if the plants they believe in this model, why not pay them? Why should the province to pay for it? Among the rest, the "bailout" of companies located in more difficult is a gross violation of the competition, which damages the area of \u200b\u200bhealthy societies, which are thus put out of business. The state clearly the industry more serious (see Chronicles in the newspaper). Why, if the province takes the company's facilities with the budgets in red, what's the go crazy to make ends meet and to set up economies of scale, and to introduce innovations to market? Here we reward those who make debts and losses, not those with budgets in order. Può reggere un mercato sano tutto questo? Nemmeno la giustificazione che si tratta di «mezzi pubblici» sta in piedi. Infatti, un conto è garantire l'autobus che arrivi in ogni paese, e un altro alimentare artificialmente stazioni in bassa quota che da nessuna altra parte al mondo avrebbe senso mantenere. Le ovovie non sono un servizio pubblico da finanziare con le tasse dei cittadini. Al limite, lo possono essere con l'autofinanziamento degli operatori turistici che traggono vantaggio diretto dalla presenza degli sciatori. Forse è giunto il momento di porre un freno deciso alla collettivizzazione forzata in atto da tempo in questa terra. Perché a questo punto ne va della sopravvivenza del Trentino stesso, già economia assistita, che rischia to become a province-free economy, because all collectivized. The purchase of 50 million of the sheds at Whirlpool are unfortunately one of countless examples.
Pierangelo Giovanetti, director of the Adige
p.giovanetti @ ladige.it
0 comments:
Post a Comment